| Author |
Message |
fishhunter
Regular
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 403
Location: Jedburgh
|
 Posted:
Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:40 pm |
 
|
what is the difference between these lines? |
| |
|
|
|
|
oldgreyfox
Guest
|
| Posted:
Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:59 am |
|
Flourocarbon is stiffer , has less strech and a lower refractive index (less visible in water) than mono .
Google is your friend , try searching "fluorocarbon vs mono fishing line" lots of interesting info . 
Andy |
| |
|
|
|
|
glenthespinner
Member
Joined: Jun 01, 2009
Posts: 68
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
no m8 flourocarbon is not still its really soft and flexible but is strechy .berkley transition is the best |
| |
|
|
|
|
eccles
Advanced User
Joined: May 19, 2005
Posts: 3038
Location: Hayling Island, Hampshire
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:40 pm |
|
Only difference that matters is the price.
People seem to imagine that fish have sufficient brains to say to themselves "ooh look a bit of fishing line, better go carefully here". That would make fish almost as intelligent as us which they patently are not. |
| |
|
|
|
|
manic_muppet
Advanced User
Joined: Apr 07, 2008
Posts: 3782
Location: Bradford, W/Yorks
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:31 pm |
|
Speak for yourself Eccles, i pit my wits against them often, and lose.  Cheers..Mick |
| |
|
|
|
|
redmouse
Advanced User
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
Posts: 612
Location: cork, ireland
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:11 pm |
|
ive never used flurocorbon and i still catch the odd fish. i think it only makes a difference if your targeting certain fish. a lot of mullet heads wouldnt dream of putting a bit of bait out without it. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
