| Author |
Message |
Pinky
Member


Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Posts: 78
Location: Portsmouth
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:57 am |
|
Anyone know anything about these rods???? I'm looking at getting a new 13ft beach rod as my old rod was an Abu Elite and was a little too heavy for the fishing i wanted to do
They look like good value once you get past the fact its a shakespeare.... Also i like that it comes with a reducer as i like to cast with the reel in a low position |
| |
|
|
|
 |
simon2345
Advanced User


Joined: Apr 05, 2008
Posts: 653
Location: Southampton
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm |
|
Excellent Rod m8.Recommend one or two.. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
Pinky
Member


Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Posts: 78
Location: Portsmouth
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:39 pm |
|
What sort of casting distances can they achieve??? also are they ok to use for light pendulum casts???? |
| |
|
|
|
 |
simon2345
Advanced User


Joined: Apr 05, 2008
Posts: 653
Location: Southampton
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:15 pm |
|
I should think so.There a well made Rod and as for distance that would depend on the individual and reel..but a good 100yds would be easy.
Remember distance is not everything.. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
rabbi2
Global Moderator


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 9234
Location: Blackburn. Lancashire
|
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:35 pm |
|
A good tool at a fair and reasonable price. Cheers keith  |
| |
|
|
|
 |
oldgreyfox
Guest

|
Posted:
Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:15 am |
|
I had the same problem as you Pinky with an abhorance of anything Shakespeare after seeing rods and reels litteraly fall apart on me during the 70s and 80s .
After using a mates salt bass rod I was so impressed I went out and bought one . Then I thought Id try a salt beach caster . I`m more than very happy with it . The finish , quality of the fittings and all round feel of the rod are not what I have come to expect from Shakespeare , they are superb . If the lable said Greys most people would happily part with £120 plus for these rods .
Put aside your anti Shakespeare predudice and get one (or 2) you wont be disapointed . |
| |
|
|
|
 |
Pinky
Member


Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Posts: 78
Location: Portsmouth
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:14 am |
|
cheers for the help guys.... i think i'm going to have a look around the tackle shopd in portsmouth and see what i can get for the money with the Salt MX in mind hopefully one of them will have one of these also so i can have a good look at it... then i'll amke my decision and buy the one i feel is best |
| |
|
|
|
 |
dizzy
Regular


Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 333
Location: Bridport
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:21 pm |
|
I have an MX as a backup rod but I may start using it alot more after seeing all the posts about Sonik SK3's snapping.
Its a nice stiff rod, well conpared to all my other rods, and yes you can MULLER it over 100 yards.
Really really good Price and its a rod with a reducer which I like. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
gerwynmr2
Member


Joined: Mar 24, 2009
Posts: 23
Location: tonypandy rhondda
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:16 pm |
|
bought a salt mx 12ft with reducer and an okuma magnetix a month ago .
these rods are fantastic value for the money i have seen them for sale in total sea fishing mag torbay angling ad for 50 quid
i have cast a five oz lead in a field with a half pendulum reel down low 185 yards witch ws measured and that was with the okuma straight out of the box buy one and enjoy you willnot be dissapointed |
| |
|
|
|
 |
eccles
Advanced User


Joined: May 19, 2005
Posts: 3038
Location: Hayling Island, Hampshire
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:38 pm |
|
If you have a look at them closely you will see that they have a decent thickness of carbon fibre unlike the Soniks. Be careful though when looking around, some tackle shops over charge for them. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
George6500i
Regular


Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 253
Location: Woodbury, Devon
|
Posted:
Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:26 pm |
|
i bought a pair and they were £80 each?
is that overcharged??? |
| |
|
|
|
 |
dizzy
Regular


Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 333
Location: Bridport
|
Posted:
Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:28 pm |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|